The authors are especially grateful for the comments and encouragement of the late dick wittink. Despite being a lowinvolvement category, there is evidence that wom is linked to tvviewing behaviour godes and mayzlin, 2004. The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating wordofmouth sarit moldovan, jacob goldenberg, amitava chattopadhyay. She also studies advertising and communication strategies. Recherche et applications en marketing french edition. Pdf using online conversations to study wordofmouth.
This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate that discus. David godes is a deans professor of marketing and is the chair of the marketing department. Malhotra, 1982, a consumer searching for product information in cyberspace does not read every. A quasiexperiment, harvard business school working paper. Harvard business school marketing research paper no. Manski 1993, godes and mayzlin 2004, 2009, hartmann et al 2008, aral et al 2009, aral 2010. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of the firms proactive management of consumertoconsumer communication. Viral marketing has become an increasingly popular promotional tool kirsner 2005. The relative influence of advertising and wordofmouth on viewing. Godes and mayzlin 2004 showed in a different setting that the dispersion of conversations about tv shows across online consumer communities and the popularity of these tv shows were strongly related. Godes and mayzlin 2004 find a positive relationship between online wom and television show viewership. Jessie cheng and tudor olteanu provided excellent research assistance.
In the research reported here, this negativity effect was present only for experience. Godes and mayzlin 2004 demonstrate a positive relationshipbetweenonlinewominparticular,its dispersion across communitiesand ratings for television shows. Dina mayzlin research focuses on how businesses manage social interactions. What we know and dont know about online wordofmouth.
Electronic word of mouth is also more effective compared to the traditional word of mouth due to widespread access resources chatterjee, 2001. Introduction it is widely believed that social contagion and wordofmouth wom buzz about products drive product adoption and sales, and firms increasingly rely on network and viral marketing strategies hill et al 2006, manchanda et al 2008, nam et al 2010. The higher the dispersion is, the wider the impact of wom will be. They also thank participants at many seminars for helpful comments, as well as sharon oster, jackie luan, david godes, and jiwoong shin. A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on. Godes, david and dina mayzlin, using online conversations to study wordofmouth communication, marketing science, 2004, volume 23, issue 4, pp.
We are particularly interested in understanding how, if at all, the firm should go about effecting meaningful wordofmouth. Using online conversations to study wordofmouth communication 550 marketingscience234,pp. Managers are very interested in wordofmouth communication because they believe that a products successis related to the word of mouth that it generates. Professor mayzlin s research has won a number of awards, including the john d. Creating social contagion through viral product design 1 1. Managers are very interested in wordofmouth communication because they believe that a products success is related to the word of mouth that it generates. Professor mayzlins research has won a number of awards, including the john d. Social media in an alternative marketing communication model. We therefore designed and conducted a randomized field experiment. The different roles of product originality and usefulness in. These influencers are also suggested to shape consumers perceptions lee and watkins, 2016. Their approach has to assume that the unobserved quality is not serially correlated. However, there are at least three significant challenges associated with measuring word of mouth. Ideas and opinions that exhibit strong dispersion across communities are thus likely to have substantial staying power.
A randomized trial of peer influence in networks sinan aral. The effect of electronic word of mouth on brand image and. Godes and mayzlin 2004 have shown that opinion leaders may not always play a primary role in dissemination. The ones marked may be different from the article in the profile. Modeling the impact of wordofmouth at the individual level abstract most studies of wordofmouth wom in marketing have concentrated either on aggregate outcomes e. In exchange for the cars, the bloggers posted monthly updates and videos about the. Recherche et applications en marketing french edition 2016 19. This cited by count includes citations to the following articles in scholar. Electronic wordofmouth has a positive impact on brand image. Godes, david and dina mayzlin 2004, using online conversations to study wordofmouth communication, marketing science, 23 4, 54560pdf. Wom recommendations to purchase experience goods such as cds, movies, videos or dvds, and games godes and mayzlin 2004. The firms management of social interactions springerlink.
Citeseerx document details isaac councill, lee giles, pradeep teregowda. The internet is a vast and distributed medium and has several different platforms that host online conversations. Using the compensation scheme to signal the ease of a task. These actions range from facetoface recommendations from a friend to the passive observation of what a stranger is wearing. Modeling the impact of wordofmouth at the individual level abstract most studies of wordofmouth wom in marketing have concentrated either on. Godes and mayzlin 2004 p 546 define platform dispersion as the extent to which productrelated conversations are taking place across a broad range of communities. Godes and mayzlin 2004 note that measuring the ewom generated by a firms product is important for understanding a products past sales level andfor predicting its future sales. By combining a largescale examination of real transmission in the field with tightly controlled experiments, we both demonstrate characteristics of viral online content.
The primary role of these online influencers is to extend a brands reach. One interestingquestion for future research is when and why different online wordofmouth metrics have a stronger impact on or are more predictive of behavior, sales, or other relevant outcomes. According to granovetter 1973, opinions spread quickly within communities, but slowly across them. This literature, however, sheds less light on the underlying processes that drive. Similarly, godes and mayzlin 2004 are unable to determine whether it was the online conv ersations that led to certain shows success or whether these con versations were proxies for of. Elberse and eliashberg 2003 propose a simultaneousequations model to address the simultaneity of audience expectation and number of screens. The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating wordofmouth. Electronic word of mouth can be described as a communication way that provides information to. Are social networking more persuasive than traditional. Consumers are motivated to spread information via wordofmouth communications when they are satisfied or dissatisfied with a product anderson, 1998. Creating social contagion through viral product design creating social contagion through viral product design. Although the authors nd that both wom and ol in uence aggregate product sales, it is an open question whether this result found at the aggregate level is driven by all consumers.
Consumers are believed to rely on personal recommendations from the online influencers they follow and admire, for their purchasing decisions godes and mayzlin, 2004. Godes and mayzlin 2004 tv shows tv ratings no effect chevalier and mayzlin 2006 books book sales rank positive effect positive effect clemons et al. Little best paper award, the isms long term impact award, the odell long term impact award, and the frank m. Winner of the ama sales sigs 2004 excellence in research award godes, david, contracting under endogenous risk, quantitative marketing and economics 2004, volume 2, pp. Using online conversations to study wordofmouth communication. Consumer choice is influenced in a direct and meaningful way by the actions taken by others. Managers are very interested in wordofmouth communication because they believe that. Creating social contagion through viral product design. Purchase intention survey of millennials towards online. Jul 27, 2004 godes, david and mayzlin, dina, firmcreated wordofmouth communication. Dellarocas, zhang, and awad 2007 find that adding online movie ratings to. But what drives people to share content with others and what type of content is more likely to be shared. The different roles of product originality and usefulness. Marketing companies are taking advantage of these findings.
Social media usage, electronic word of mouth and purchase. Usingonlineconversationstostudy wordofmouthcommunication. Other advantages to consumers who utilize ewom include its instant, ubiquitous and nearly permanent availability, amenability to search, interactivity encouraging content cocreation, and transparency lindgreen et al. The firms management of social interactions usc marshall. To illustrate, in their study of online conversations about television shows, godes and mayzlin 2004 construed members of the same online communities as characterized by strong ties because they interacted more frequently, relative to members of different. Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Thus, although the aforementioned studies demonstrate that summary statistics. Godes, david and mayzlin, dina, using online conversations to study. The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating wordofmouth abstract this paper explores how dimensions of new product, specifically, originality and usefulness, influence wordofmouth wom. Because the information is exchanged in private conversations, direct observation traditionally has been. He joined the smith school faculty in 2009 after teaching for ten years at harvard business school. Managers are very interested in wordofmouth communication.
1567 353 1462 740 94 858 327 1390 787 27 1341 513 513 588 998 695 1199 450 1064 1381 257 910 629 1069 1096 189 631 636 551 290 1544 729 833 184 337 1447 505 937 1288 827